Outside finish is good, jaw and hammering surfaces were milled smooth and level. Feature wise, it matches up to it's higher-end and pricier competitor. Not wanting to pay the price for a high-end Wilton I found this. I came in hesitant after using a friends Wilton 6" vise, I realized I needed an upgrade over my ancient 4" vise. Mounting the vise on the workbench, then you could complete the work of grinding, clamping, fixing, etc. Multifunctional Application: This workbench vise is widely used in the industry or household.The workbench vise can clamp and tighten quickly and smoothly after precise grinding. Precision & Hardness: Polishing lead screw and guide rail are upgraded to achieve high precision and high hardness.360 Degrees Rotation: The head of the vise can be rotated by 360 degrees for extra versatility, and the swivel base of the vise allows for optimal work placement and flexibility.Heavy-Duty Ductile Iron: The bench vise is made of ductile iron which increases durability and longevity, this table vise is designed to be used in tough surroundings.Jaw width is 6'' / 152 mm, jaw opening is 5'' / 127 mm, throat depth is 3'' / 76 mm, and clamp force is 30 kN. Sufficient Clamping Capacity: The built-in jaws are grooved for enhanced grip and allow for easy clamping of pipe and other rounded material.Lock ContentionĖ7.02Ē.88 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads I will be sure to return to this thread and post results for you as I start upgrading this mini.įloating Point Basicē9.38ę35.71 Mflop/secįloating Point LibraryĔ3.49ė.57 Mops/secĬomputationĖ0.60đ.23 Mops/sec, 4 threads In fact a lot of people in the past would use ram drives to jack their scores up. One of the things I remember that will drastically change your score is the harddrive speed. Here you go clean - I ran xbench again this morning. Just run the benchmark and post your score and get on with it! It's not the final score you should focus on but the individual scores that each category gets. I compare it to what other macs I have used have scored. What the benchmark is good for is just a general comparison. (my Digital Audio G4 Tower 1.2ghz which I since sold scored close to 80 on this benchmark, and like 140 on the older rating system of the benchmark) My first upgrade will be a much faster harddrive. It's a bit slow, but it's a single G4 and it has a slow harddrive. (which I just bought today from someone for only $250.00 ) Uncached Readė5.55đ4.02 MB/sec Īfter the very first run on a Mac Mini 1.42ghz. Lock ContentionĖ5.16Ē.80 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Because, honestly, how often do you apply a 100 pixel gaussian blur on your digital photos?įloating Point Basicē6.92Ę77.33 Mflop/secįloating Point LibraryĔ3.50ė.57 Mops/secĬomputationĖ0.58đ.23 Mops/sec, 4 threads There is no point in running testing a bunch of Photoshop filter that you'll never use. And only run the tests that are actually of importance to you. The ONLY good way to benchmark is to run the applications YOU will run, in situations similar to the ones you'll put your computer in. The fact that one computer is ten times faster than another one at Photoshop, even if we disregard Rosetta, does not mean diddlysquat if you never run Photoshop. There is no such thing as "general computing performance." All there is, is how well a certain computer performs at a certain task. So why is it that a 20" Intel iMac gets a UI test score of 20, which is about as much as the iBook G4? And one even bigger problem with it: Intel Macs always get shitty UI scores in Xbench, despite the fact that it's common knowledge that the Intel Macs "feel" a whole lot faster in terms of UI speed. Things like the vecLib FFT test are not really comparable between the Intel Macs and the PowerPC Macs. And only sometimes, at that: Xbench's results are often pretty varying even on the same hardware.Īnother problem with it is how it works. All it will tell you is that it will run Xbench better. The fact that computer A beats computer B at Xbench does NOT mean it will be faster at Safari, or Photoshop, or Doom 3, or anything else for that matter. All it does is tell you how well the computer runs Xbench. The problem with something like Xbench is that it doesn't tell you anything vital. I guess you should run a bunch of Photoshop benchmarks, or something. Click to expand.You mean that doesn't suck? None, really.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |